"I have been reading your amazing blog and listening to some of your podcasts with Carolyn. Not sure how I haven't run across your work before. Amazing stuff." (reader's comment, 10 May 2016)
Come chat with us! Download and install an IRC-client -- Hexchat is recommended -- and go to the channel #National-Socialism on the Undernet server.

26 June 2014

The Ahmed Chalabi of Germany

Highly Rewarded Liar Hermann Rauschning
Hermann Rauschning was a disgruntled former member of the NSDAP who wrote a book, marketed variously as Conversations with Hitler or The Voice of Destruction, that revealed what were supposed to have been private conversations in which Hitler had made many shocking statements. This book was highly influential and heavily utilized in Anglo-American war-propaganda. Most of the "quotes" of Adolf Hitler found in the U.S. War Department's Why We Fight series of propaganda-films, for example, are derived from Rauschning.

Among the astounding statements attributed to Hitler by Rauschning are the following:

"Terror is the most effective political instrument."

"I am willing to sign anything. I will do anything to facilitate the success of my policy."
“Providence has ordained that I should be the greatest liberator of humanity.  I am freeing man from the restraints of an intelligence that has taken charge, from the dirty and degrading self-mortification of a false vision called conscience and morality, and from the demands of a freedom and independence which only a very few can bear.”
"Yes, we are barbarians. We want to be barbarians, it is an honored title to us. We shall rejuvenate the world. This world is near its end.”

"The Ten Commandments have lost their validity.  Conscience is a Jewish invention, it is a blemish like circumcision.”

This is just a sample, but you get the idea. The picture of Adolf Hitler that Rauschning presented was of an amoral megalomaniac with whom any attempt to have peaceful dealings would be foolhardy and futile.

As for Rauschning himself, he achieved fame and fortune, selling many books and writing a syndicated weekly newspaper-column in the United States during the war. He was even called as an expert witness in the Mass-Sedition Trial of 1944.

In early 1939, before war had broken out, Rauschning was declaring that Hitler was bent on war and would launch a surprise attack on Britain and France. This is not what happened, but the fact that Rauschning was saying such things -- and being widely quoted in news-media -- tended to increase paranoia and make war more likely.

More generally, once one accepts Rauschning's representation of Hitler as a madman, one can more easily accept other bizarre claims about him. In that way, Rauschning's fiction served as a foundation that established credibility for the rest of Anglo-American war-propaganda.

In effect, Hermann Rauschning was to Adolf Hitler and Germany what Ahmed Chalabi was to Saddam Hussein and Iraq -- a disgruntled defector willing to profit from lying. (The CIA considers defectors to be untrustworthy as sources of information, but they have been nonetheless effective as propagandists.)

The worst part is that many mainstream historians, apparently reluctant to let go of the old notions that were originally instilled as war-propaganda, still use Rauschning as a source. But even in works about Hitler and National-Socialist Germany where Rauschning is not cited as a source, his influence seems to persist in the form of a general presumption about Hitler's character.

A Swiss researcher named Wolfgang Haenel -- in no way a friend to Adolf Hitler -- determined in 1983 that Rauschning's supposed conversations with Hitler were not authentic for the following reasons, summarized by Hanns Neuerbourg:

Haenel says his research established that:

-- Rauschning, who headed the government of the Free City of Danzing (now Gdansk, Poland) after the Nazi party won local elections there in 1933, never belonged to the "innermost circle" of Hitler confidants.

-- Records show that Rauschning, an honorary colonel in the SS elite guard, had only a very few meetings with Hitler, and none in private.

-- Rauschning admitted he kept only "scanty jottings" of his meetings with Hitler. His "confidential" quotes include excerpts from later speeches by the Fuehrer and paraphrased comments from Hitler's Mein Kampf

-- Numerous distortions and fabrications in the book were designed to strengthen Allied resolve and to encourage the United States and other nations to join the war-effort.

-- A chapter on "Hitler Himself" in which Rauschning tells of the Fuehrer hearing voices, waking at night with convulsive shrieks, and uttering unintelligible phrases, was inspired by a novel by French writer Guy de Maupassant. [Hanns Neuerbourg, AP, 2 November 1985]

If we had paid attention to Haenel in the 1980s, instead of remaining naive about lying defectors and their demonization-propaganda, perhaps we would have recognized in 2003 that Ahmed Chalabi was really the Hermann Rauschning of Iraq.

15 June 2014

White Males are Never held Accountable?

That's what feminist writer Elizabeth Plank said in a roundtable discussion about the Elliot Rodger spree-shooting on MSNBC. The maker of the video below points out that Elliot Rodger was in fact of mixed race (East-Asian and Jew) and if he had been the victim of the crime, would likely have been sympathetically  identified as mixed, rather than invidiously  misidentified as White.

The claim that White men are not held accountable for crimes when they commit them is absurd: White men are blamed even for crimes that they did not commit. George Zimmerman was clearly not White, but was falsely labeled as White in early reporting on the Trayvon Martin shooting-incident because it fit into a preconceived narrative about violent White male conspiracies. There was violence against White people as a result of this false reporting. The feminist writer who claims that White men are never held accountable is doing the same, blaming White men based on an incident where the perpetrator was not White.

Mixed-Race Miscreant Elliot Rodger
In fact, Elliot Rodger's being of mixed race was very likely a factor in his mental illness, and in his frustration with trying to date White women. A study at UC Davis has shown that people of mixed East-Asian and "Caucasian" ancestry have twice the incidence of mental illness found in people of unmixed race:

A new study of Chinese-Caucasian, Filipino-Caucasian, Japanese-Caucasian and Vietnamese-Caucasian individuals concludes that biracial Asian Americans are twice as likely as monoracial Asian Americans to be diagnosed with a psychological disorder. [...] [Professor of psychology Nolan] Zane and his co-investigator, UC Davis psychology graduate student Lauren Berger, found that 34 percent of biracial individuals in a national survey had been diagnosed with a psychological disorder, such as anxiety, depression or substance abuse, versus 17 percent of monoracial individuals. The higher rate held up even after the researchers controlled for differences between the groups in age, gender and life stress, among other factors.[UC Davis News and Information, 18 August 2008]

The delicately feminine appearance and unimpressive physique created by Mongoloid admixture likely contributed (on top of his being a mentally ill creep) to Elliot Rodger's inability, despite having plenty of money and an expensive car, to persuade White women to date him. Rodger specifically complained about being rejected by blondes. White Women generally do not prefer a man with a round, girlish face and bee-stung lips. That does not meet the expectation of masculine appearance in the White race.

06 June 2014

A National-Socialist View of European Unity

While Alfred Rosenberg distrusts the motives of those advocating a "United States of Europe" in the 1920s (among whom Jews figured prominently), he sees it as desirable that European states at least stop fighting among themselves in foreign policy and present a united front against the rising non-White world. Rosenberg mentions that there were those who fantasized that European unity would empower the Catholic Church, but considers that an unlikely prospect. The main question ultimately was whether and how some kind of unity could be established without facilitating plutocratic subjugation of Europe. 

The answer to that question, as it has turned out in 1940 and again in the 21st century, seems to be that if there is to be a united Europe, Germany's dominance of that union is the viable alternative to Jewish dominance, since the Germans were and are the strongest nation on the continent.


United States of Europe? 
Alfred Rosenberg
Völkischer Beobachter, 13/14 December 1925

Translated 2014 by Hadding Scott

In recent months, concurrent with the propaganda for the “League of Nations,” the activity of the so-called “Pan-European Association” is also increasing, At the same time various press-agencies conducted polls among politicians and writers on how they regard this so-called “United States of Europe.” Thus the Neue Wiener Journal has just conducted such an inquiry, and asked a series of famous personalities of all states their opinion on the following questions: 
1. Do you consider the creation of the United States of Europe necessary? 
2. Do you consider the ratification of the United States of Europe possible?

To these inquiries the French finance-minister Caillaux answered that the patriotism of the 20th century would amalgamate with Europeanism. The “Easter of the European Union” would come; it would come, just as inevitably as there are physical laws. Ignatz Seipel, the former federal chancellor of Austria, hopes the same and wishes a general “revision of the concept of the state”! A similar view was expressed by Anton Svelah, the minister-president of Czechoslovakia.

Jacob Lippowitz, the Jewish editor of the Neue Wiener Journal, declares: the boundary-markers of the European states have proven to be torture-stakes for every citizen of a European state. Similar statements came from Maximilian Harden, Albert Einstein, Alfred Kerr, and of course Dr. Gerhart Hauptmann, Heinrich Mann, and Dr. Thomas Mann!1

As we see, quite a list of personages finds this buzzword, the United States of Europe, agreable. Yet it is naturally clear that most of them understand something entirely different by it. Herr Lippowitz and his consorts are certainly thinking of a single Jewish private syndicate, as Walther Rathenau also had visualized. All nation-states would then have to fit into this. Ignatz Seipel however surely dreams of the Mediaeval reign of the church, and the others meanwhile pursue their highest real-world foreign-policy goals.

But whatever the motives of the individual may be, the fact of a strong movement somehow to bring about a European federation is there, and we therefore have to concern ourselves with this problem and to declare our position on it.

Without doubt an awakening is manifesting in the entire world. The awakening of the Near and Far East, and indeed upon a racial backdrop, is plain to see, and even the Black portion of the Earth has begun to announce its demands in a similar manner. Only a fool can believe that this pressure from outside of Europe does not also require a common European stance. This awakening of the Near and Far East is the response to the robber-economy and the corrupting influences that mercantile Europe has brought with its political conquests to India and China. But this unbridled robber-economy and robber-politics has not only fostered all bad instincts in the colonies or quasi-colonial lands, but unleashed them also in Europe itself, where they are deliberately stoked further by clever politicians.
The present-day propaganda for the “United States of Europe,” which originates from the circles of the stock-exchange and the Jewish press, means nothing more than a logical continuation of this same robber-economy, sanctioned by a politically strengthened federation. It is thus self-evident that we stand in the sharpest opposition to this new fraud. Fact is, on the other hand, that there is a growing awareness in foreign policy that mutual warring of the European nations also means the end of every single national culture. This awakening sense of a European solidarity in foreign policy is exploited and bastardized today by the same politicians that all European peoples can thank for their present-day misery.

The “United States of Europe” would have to be rejected by us already just on the grounds that such a character as the half-Asian Count Coudenhove-Kalergi is its leading exponent. This man preaches, instead of adherence to what is organic, to race and national tradition, absolute racial mishmash, and is thus to be treated as a new herald of European decline.

Nevertheless the recognition of the necessity for Europe to be unified in foreign policy stands apart from the question of whether it must bring a whole series of grievous problems in its wake. But one ought to consider that if we face an either/or – destruction of the Eveningland or Europe's security in the world – ways would have to be found to accomplish this goal. At the top stands a demand without the fulfillment of which all is in vain: the exclusion [Ausscheidung] of the Jews from all states of Europe. This in turn can only be the consequence of an awakening of racial feeling, of a new state-idea, and of a reconceptualization of economic life.
1. In this list of six supporters of European unification, the first three names belong to ethnic Jews. Einstein, the promulgator of a theory of relativity and admirer of Joseph Stalin, everybody knows as a Jew, because Jews want everybody to know it. The Jew Maximilian Harden was named Felix Witkowski at birth but changed his name and converted to Protestantism, becoming a sometime newspaper-columnist and publisher of a magazine called Die Zukunft from 1892 until 1923. Politically Harden/Witkowski seems to have been an opportunist, a warmonger in 1914 but a supporter of the Treaty of Versailles in 1919. The Jew Alfred Kerr was born with the surname Kempner, calling himself Kerr from the age of 20 and becoming a theater-critic. Of the non-Jews listed, Heinrich Mann's political views were such that he was planning to settle in the Communist "German Democratic Republic" at the time of his death in 1950, and was honored by that government with a postage-stamp. Younger brother Thomas Mann was so wicked that he actually made broadcasts against his homeland during the Second World War and became a naturalized citizen of the United States in 1944, at a time when aerial bombardment by the United States was incinerating tens of thousands of German civilians in thousand-plane raids. Gerhart Hauptmann was a Social-Democrat who had been considered subversive by the Hohenzollerns prior to the First World War, and was noted immediately after the war as a pacifist.  In 1933 however Hauptmann applied for membership in the NSDAP (but was rejected).